Peptide Footnotes

Verdict

Unproven rulings

An Unproven ruling means no meaningful human evidence exists for the claim as stated. Some of these compounds have mouse or cell studies, a patent or a long history of forum use; none has a controlled trial in people that tests the promised effect. That is true for many products sold as research peptides and blends, and for most daily dose charts attached to them.

Unproven is a statement about the record, not a forecast. A good trial could change it, and the file would then be updated with a new review date. Until then, any figure quoted for such a compound comes from a seller, a forum or an animal study, and the file says which. See the method for what would move a claim up to weak or better.

Files

14 cases · Unproven